For the second year running, my pre-favourite has won Eurovision, which in all my years as a fan before had never happened before. Yet, also for the second year running, the contest left me with a bitter aftertaste and again the slightest feeling of falling out of love.
I am left with a few questions that I would like to raise here for your consideration and discussion on the MB or elsewhere.
As a gift to all you lovely ESC geeks and freaks, if you want an overview of the detailed scores and rankings from all shows, you can download an Excel sheet I made last night here. Enjoy!
1. What the hell just happened?
![]() |
Picture: Sarah Louise Bennett/EBU |
Okay, that one was too easy, I know - but still.
I had some predictions horribly wrong (I *really* got carried away by the San Marino hype, in spite of always strongly disliking their entry myself) and the only country I got right 100% in terms of placing was Albania. Many other countries were placed in similar-ish positions. I called the jury and public vote winners correctly, and the same applied to the nil points for Remember Monday.
But seriously, also nothing, nade, niente, nichts for Switzerland? I did predict it would get the majority of its points from the jury - but all of them? Truly insane.
I had also massively underestimated the appeal of Tommy Cash, among both votes. It's interesting how the televote top two consists of songs performed third and fourth in the running order. This mitigates all the discussions and critiques about 'good' and 'bad' positions considerably.
The same of course applies to the bookmakers. Sweden's odds kept improving until the start of the voting and then it all kinda fell apart. Sweden still came 4th, a showing that many countries would almost kill for (*cries in Red Sebastian*), but it felt very underwhelming for them.
A solution? Trusting your own gut feeling more! Curb your inner Fionnuola Sweeney and don't get carried away as much. Worry less about the effects of the running order and put less trust into how people spend their betting money.
2. How much time do we have left?
Maybe I'm a bit too dramatic here, but I genuinely believe that Eurovision as an event and a(n often ridiculed but nevertheless sustaining and thriving) European institution cannot survive its own voting system for too much longer.
Last year, the Israeli broadcaster and government set up a huge media campaign (including a billboard on Times Square in NYC) to urge people to vote for Israel, as massively as possible, no matter what their entry was. It was perhaps the clearest sign that Eurovision is very much a political event ever.
The EBU's reaction? Crickets. They let it all happen again this year. Unexplainable, as Nemo sang. And this time it really paid off for Israel, because they won the televote and now, like Ukraine in 2022, can use this as a 'signal' that Europe supports them and their atrocities.
And there, I said it: Ukraine. I didn't hate Bird of Pray, but Ziferblat won the first semi final is, pardon my French, absolutely ridiculous. While we have no way of knowing for certain as that would require in-depth qualitative research among voters in numerous parts of the continent, it does at least indicate that people vote less for a song and more for a country. This is actually backed up by prior research, albeit limited and by now rather old.
A solution? Limiting the number of votes per device and credit card. One person, one vote. Of course this hurts broadcasters financially as they in many cases profit of televotes which sustains their further participation. So again, this is not as easy and straightforward as it all sounds. But some action will be inevitably necessary.
3. Oú est Céline?
Carzo, of course, whose presence on stage with Paola and Peter, Sue and Marc would have made that fabulous interval act even better. Who cares she went for Luxembourg??
No, of course I mean La Dion.
During the two rehearsals on Friday, the hosts gave the exact same speech as during the first semi final on Tuesday and we saw the same recorded video message by our chanteuse québécquoise.
Yet by yesterday morning, the script had altered and any mentioning of Dion had been cut entirely. This only fuelled hope and expectations that she would make a surprise appearance, but we got nothing.
Something happened for sure. Was she actually in Basel but did she decide to not show at the last moment? Did Lumo abduct her? Can anyone confirm that Céline Dion is actually okay right now? Please?
A solution? A new video message from Céline, hopefully not asking for ransom or a hosting job for Lumo during Eurovision 2026 in Vienna/Innsbruck/Graz to guarantee her survival.
4. Why was Michele Hunziker there?
It took me a while, but I ended up genuinely liking Sandra and Hazel. They had to find their groove but once they did they had very good chemistry on screen. Hazel was a revelation and I love that she got her pockets of time to do her own thing and shine off-script.
But for some bizarre reason the organisers felt the need to include a third host in the final. I'm not sure if she was inebriated, stoned or both, but it felt as if she was thrown in at the last minute and hadn't had a second to read the script before she had to read her lines from the teleprompter.
It just all felt very unnecessary in what was already a very long final with many unnecessary parts. This of course includes Hunziker's heartless rendition of Volare. But don't you dare criticise or touch Sandra's Canzone per te performance. Studer needs to be protected at all times.
A solution? Sticking to the same hosts across all shows. Yes, looking at you too, Graham Norton.
5. Why do the Swiss hate people who want to follow the voting?
There were many odd choices made in how the shows were structured and flowed but arguably the worst thing for me was the jury vote reveal.
We only saw the total scoreboard for a few seconds per country before moving on, making it impossible to keep track of what was going on.
This truly baffles me as I thought the Swedes absolutely nailed the jury vote presentation last year. The first points were displayed on the full scoreboard automatically while also having the host and spokesperson on-screen the entire time. It was so easy and convenient to follow.
Who came up with this? Why did they think it was a good idea? How long did it take you before you realised that Estonia was actually doing *well* in the jury vote and that Iceland still had zero?
A solution? Just not doing this ever again??
6. Where was Lumo?
This is an honest question. The... figure (in lieu of a better word) had been introduced as the official mascot for this year's edition. Yet, Eurocat, Eurobird and good old Leo (from 2022 fame; I too had to look it up again) were featured prominently during the shows' postcards. Lumo was absolutely nowhere. I didn't see it anywhere in the streets of Basel, and believe me, I have looked for it.
I was totally expecting Lumo to announce the Swiss jury votes but I guess the Italian mouse stole its limelight?
What was the point of introducing a mascot if it ended up not being used at all? Could the extremely negative reactions have caused or at least contributed to its disappearance? Where is Lumo now? Are they okay? Is Céline Dion with them?
A solution? Announcing Lumo as the eternal mascot of Eurovision after the eternal logo and the eternal slogan. It would only be fitting.
--
On a final note, thanks to all of you who read and commented on the blogs over the past week. It was intense but I very much enjoyed doing them and hope you enjoyed reading them :) Tack och forlåt!